Why Stock Photos?
The short answer is that we use stock photos on some listings to save us time and to save you money. The longer answer is that we love to take photos of each and every lens, camera, and accessory, but doing so takes a lot of time and makes it difficult to get everything listed. So, we decided to compromise: take gorgeous photos of some things and charge a little more for them, and use stock photos for other items and charge a little less for those, all else equal.
The items listed here were tested thoroughly by our trained technicians. If they observed any significant flaws, you’ll see them detailed above. If the items listed here are exceptionally awesome, you’ll see that noted above too. Regardless, please remember this is a used item and it’s bound to have at least a microscopic imperfection.
If you're interested in purchasing an item with specific photos and ratings, we don’t blame you one bit. Please visit one of our Exposed! listings (if available), usually marked with a green badge. If none are currently available, by all means, contact us.
Hover To Zoom Full Size
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II for Canon
Want new stock alerts for this product?
Log in to sign up for emails when more come in.
The Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II for Canon
A sharp, cost-effective alternative when you don’t need image stabilization in your wide angle f/2.8 lens. It’s reasonably small and lightweight, nice and sharp, and easy to use.
There are several choices in the 17-50mm range for crop-sensor cameras, and rather than doing separate takes for each, I thought a bit of comparison would be better. The summary, though, is they are all pretty good. Whichever you choose, you’ll probably be happy with it. An important generalization first: all of the 17-50 lenses are sharper at the wide end than at the long end. If you think you’ll be shooting mostly at 50mm or so, you might want to consider a 24-70 or similar range lens.
Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS. The most expensive of the bunch. It has good image stabilization, but no better than the others. It will definitely autofocus more accurately, particularly on older cameras and in lower light. It also has the least barrel distortion at the wide end (although it’s still significant at 2%). Possibly the best of the group, definitely the most expensive.
Sigma 17-50 HSM OS. As sharp as the Canon in the center, and at f/4 as sharp in the corners too. Maybe even sharper than the Canon at f/4. It has more barrel distortion at the wide end at 2.9%. That is easy to correct in photoshop, but correcting distortion also decreases resolution, particularly in the corners. Probably as good as the Canon except for autofocus in low light.
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC. This lens has excellent vibration control, as do the Sigma and Canon. It’s not quite as sharp as either, although it’s in the same ballpark, and it is less expensive. It has even more barrel distortion than the Sigma, though, at 3.3% at the wide end. Has had some autofocus problems with some Canon cameras where only the center AF point is active.
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. This is the older, non-vibration controlled version of the Tamron lens. It is optically different and actually sharper than the Tamron VC--as sharp as the Canon and Sigma versions. It doesn’t give you image stabilization, but if you’re shooting in good light where that doesn’t matter, it’s a great bargain, being less expensive than any of the others.
Are we out of stock?If you don't see exactly what you're looking for and that makes you sad, please give us a shout. We might have good news for you. Here's a link to our contact form.
We offer a 3-day inspection period on all sales, during which time you may return the item for a refund of the purchase price, not including shipping.
Finally, if you select the two-year lens warranty, you'll get additional protection from Consumer Priority Service ("CPS"). The two-year warranty will take effect after our 90-day warranty ends. Click the link below for all the details: